There is one quote in 1984 that stuck out to me, especially the last sentence. "The book fascinated him, or more exactly it reassured him. In a sense it told him nothing new, but that was part of the attraction. It said what he would have said, if it had been possible for him to set his scattered thoughts in order. It was the product of a mind similar to his own, but enormously more powerful, more systematic, less fear-ridden. The best books, he perceived, are those that tell you what you know already."
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
1984
There is one quote in 1984 that stuck out to me, especially the last sentence. "The book fascinated him, or more exactly it reassured him. In a sense it told him nothing new, but that was part of the attraction. It said what he would have said, if it had been possible for him to set his scattered thoughts in order. It was the product of a mind similar to his own, but enormously more powerful, more systematic, less fear-ridden. The best books, he perceived, are those that tell you what you know already."
Lindke and Lecture 23: The Answers
Questions: Does Lecture 22 apply only before conversion? Can contrition proceed from love of God, as in a person being sorry they sinned against the very God who died for them?
According to Lindke's paper, "Apology, Article XII (V): Of Repentance," repentance has two parts:
Walther writes, "David had contrition together with faith. That is, indeed, a sacrifice with which God is pleased. Contrition of this kind is not a mere effect of the Law, produced by the Law alone, but it is at the same time an operation of the Gospel. By the Gospel the love of God enters a person's heart, and when contrition proceeds from love of God, it is indeed a truly sweet sorrow, acceptable to God." I typed this quote before reading Lindke's article; when I came back to it today, my ears perked up. To me, this sounds like Walther is distinguishing repentance stricte dicta from late dicta.
Short Answer: Before conversion, contrition cannot proceed from love of God. Afterward, it may be seasoned with love, but this is not necessary. The bottom line is that contrition is an effect of the law.
Vocab:
Ameliorate: to make better, improve
According to Lindke's paper, "Apology, Article XII (V): Of Repentance," repentance has two parts:
- Contrition: Terrors smiting the conscience through the knowledge of sin
- Faith: Believes that, for Christ's sake, sins are forgiven, comforts the conscience and delivers from terrors
- Stricte dicta: Contrition
- Late dicta: Contrition and faith
Walther writes, "David had contrition together with faith. That is, indeed, a sacrifice with which God is pleased. Contrition of this kind is not a mere effect of the Law, produced by the Law alone, but it is at the same time an operation of the Gospel. By the Gospel the love of God enters a person's heart, and when contrition proceeds from love of God, it is indeed a truly sweet sorrow, acceptable to God." I typed this quote before reading Lindke's article; when I came back to it today, my ears perked up. To me, this sounds like Walther is distinguishing repentance stricte dicta from late dicta.
Short Answer: Before conversion, contrition cannot proceed from love of God. Afterward, it may be seasoned with love, but this is not necessary. The bottom line is that contrition is an effect of the law.
Vocab:
Ameliorate: to make better, improve
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)